APPROACH

Approach

We observe and record the differences that appear when products are used together — under the same controlled conditions.

What we look at

  • Changes in wear and finish when products are layered
  • Visible differences such as pilling, clumping, or lift
  • Whether results stay consistent when we repeat the test

Measurement process

  1. 01

    Record product and version

    A new version can change results, so we keep product identity separate from version.

    A gloved researcher handling cosmetic jars and samples on a lab bench
  2. 02

    Set experimental conditions

    Align the conditions that affect comparison.

    A researcher placing a cosmetic sample plate into a measurement instrument
  3. 03

    Prepare samples and pairs

    Prepare single-product samples and layered samples.

    Preparing cosmetic samples and combinations on a lab bench
  4. 04

    Observe and capture raw measurements

    Keep the first photos and readings as the original record.

    Observing a sample under imaging and measurement equipment
  5. 05

    Repeat and compare

    Repeat the same pairing and compare how close the results stay.

    Comparing samples prepared under the same conditions side by side
  6. 06

    Quality check

    Confirm that product, conditions, photos, and readings form one complete record.

    Checking experiment records and sample condition
  7. 07

    Publication review

    Publish only results that have been reviewed and approved.

    A researcher checking QC status and publication approval on a monitor

FROM TEST TO DECISION

From shared use to clearer choices — and better development.

EMETTE tests the product combinations people actually use — under a consistent protocol.

We connect product, version, order of use, test conditions, and results into one accumulating record.

For consumers, that becomes grounds for choosing better combinations. For product teams, it becomes a standard for checking formula interaction and real usability.

Discuss a product interaction study →